At 8:39 AM -0700 6/12/99, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>I reverted back the patch for include/storage/s_lock.h and seems
>NetBSD/m68k port begins to work again.
>
>I think we should revert back the linux/m68k patches and leave them
>for 6.5.1. Objection?
I would like to support linux/m68k, but on the Mac 68K platform the NetBSD
folks are more numerous. Unless linux outnumbers NetBSD on some 68k
platforms other than Mac (and I think Amiga) I don't think you should break
a (mostly) working port in order to support a less widely used one.
Just my $0.02.
Signature failed Preliminary Design Review.
Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated.
h.b.hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
